When considering skincare products for microneedling, safety is non-negotiable. Microneedling involves creating micro-injuries in the skin to stimulate collagen production, so any product applied post-treatment must be free from irritants and pathogens. Asce Plus Exobalm, a topical formula designed for post-procedure care, has gained attention for its compatibility with microneedling. But does it meet the rigorous standards required? Let’s break it down.
First, let’s talk formulation. The product contains 2% colloidal oatmeal, a key ingredient recognized by the National Eczema Association for its soothing properties. It’s also pH-balanced at 5.5, aligning with the skin’s natural acid mantle—a critical factor in preventing bacterial growth after microneedling. Clinical trials involving 150 participants showed zero adverse reactions when using asce plus exobalm post-microneedling, according to a 2022 study published in the *Journal of Dermatological Science*. These numbers matter because microneedling increases absorption rates by up to 300%, making ingredient safety paramount.
But what about real-world use? Take BellaSpa Clinics, a chain with 12 locations across California. They switched to Asce Plus Exobalm in 2021 after clients reported fewer instances of redness and downtime compared to previous products. One client, Sarah Thompson, shared on Instagram that her post-microneedling recovery time dropped from 48 hours to just 24 after using the balm. While anecdotal, such feedback aligns with the product’s 97% satisfaction rate in a survey of 500 aestheticians.
Industry experts weigh in too. Dr. Linda Chen, a board-certified dermatologist, explains, “Microneedling requires non-comedogenic, hypoallergenic products. Asce Plus Exobalm’s lack of parabens and sulfates meets these criteria.” She also highlights its ceramide complex, which reinforces the skin barrier within 72 hours—a timeline backed by thermal imaging studies showing accelerated healing.
Still, some ask: “Is there a risk of clogging pores?” The answer lies in the product’s testing. Independent labs analyzed 50 batches and found no pore-clogging ingredients using the comedogenicity scale (all scored 0-1). For comparison, many traditional ointments score 3-4 on the same scale. This makes it suitable even for acne-prone skin, a group representing 40% of microneedling clients based on 2023 industry reports.
Cost-effectiveness also plays a role. At $45 for a 50ml tube, it’s priced 20% lower than medical-grade alternatives like Cicaplast Baume B5 while offering similar benefits. Clinics report using 30% less product per session due to its spreadable texture—a practical advantage when budgeting for high-volume practices.
So, is it safe? The evidence—from clinical data to real-world adoption—suggests yes. With 3 years of market presence and adoption by over 200 clinics nationwide, Asce Plus Exobalm has established itself as a reliable option. Just remember: always patch-test new products and consult your skincare provider, as individual sensitivities can vary. But for most, this balm strikes the right balance between science-backed safety and practical results.